Skip to main content
MathOverflow

Return to Question

replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
Source Link
Community Bot
Community Bot
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This is a follow-up to my last question, Homotopy excision for structured ring spectra -- reference?Homotopy excision for structured ring spectra -- reference?. The immediate reason why I care about Blakers-Massey theorems for ring spectra is to prove that algebraic $K$-theory for such rings is what is called an analytic functor. Has someone done this already?

This is a follow-up to my last question, Homotopy excision for structured ring spectra -- reference?. The immediate reason why I care about Blakers-Massey theorems for ring spectra is to prove that algebraic $K$-theory for such rings is what is called an analytic functor. Has someone done this already?

This is a follow-up to my last question, Homotopy excision for structured ring spectra -- reference?. The immediate reason why I care about Blakers-Massey theorems for ring spectra is to prove that algebraic $K$-theory for such rings is what is called an analytic functor. Has someone done this already?

Source Link
Tom Goodwillie
Tom Goodwillie
  • 55.9k
  • 7
  • 151
  • 240

Reference for analyticity of $K$-theory

This is a follow-up to my last question, Homotopy excision for structured ring spectra -- reference?. The immediate reason why I care about Blakers-Massey theorems for ring spectra is to prove that algebraic $K$-theory for such rings is what is called an analytic functor. Has someone done this already?