Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Sep 7, 2014 at 1:42 vote accept Mayank Pandey
Sep 7, 2014 at 1:40 vote accept Mayank Pandey
Sep 7, 2014 at 1:40
Aug 12, 2014 at 12:43 answer added Jan-Christoph Schlage-Puchta timeline score: 4
Jul 26, 2014 at 3:38 comment added Brendan McKay All but at most two of the integers is a multiple of 4. Don't know if that helps.
Jul 25, 2014 at 9:12 history edited Asaf Karagila
edited tags
Jul 25, 2014 at 9:06 comment added Włodzimierz Holsztyński I'd consider first two related questions: what is the largest $n$ for which there exists an $n$-set $S \subseteq \{1\ 2\ \ldots\}$ such that for every $A\subseteq S$ the sum $\sum_{a\in A}\ a^2$ is a square or a third power; and for the other question replace $a^2$ by $a^3$, and otherwise the question would look the same. Indeed, when a set of squares and cubes is large than the set of its squares or its cubes is at least half that large.
Jul 25, 2014 at 7:41 history edited Fedor Petrov CC BY-SA 3.0
edited body
Jul 25, 2014 at 3:19 comment added Gerry Myerson If you can find a set of 3 non-zero integers such that all subsets sum to squares, you will have solved the notorious integer cuboid problem.
Jul 25, 2014 at 3:05 comment added The Masked Avenger Of course, I then think of S being the first 5 positive integers. Very well, let's say one-half to be safe.
Jul 25, 2014 at 2:59 comment added The Masked Avenger I think it is unknown that for S with, say 5 or more elements, that at least a third of it subsets add up to perfect powers or even squarefull numbers with common gcd 1. I have no references to support this more general assertion.
Jul 25, 2014 at 2:40 history asked Mayank Pandey CC BY-SA 3.0