Timeline for Is this graph of reciprocal power means always convex?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 15, 2020 at 7:27 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
S Jun 5, 2019 at 20:57 | history | suggested | Glorfindel | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
broken image fixed (click 'rendered output' or 'side-by-side' to see the difference); for more info, see https://meta.mathoverflow.net/a/4058/70594
|
Jun 5, 2019 at 20:29 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Jun 5, 2019 at 20:57 | |||||
Jul 21, 2014 at 19:03 | vote | accept | Tom Leinster | ||
Jul 21, 2014 at 17:45 | answer | added | Robert Israel | timeline score: 7 | |
Jul 21, 2014 at 13:28 | comment | added | Dirk | Some tests with extreme cases seem to indicate that the answer may be negative. The small negative part of the second derivative of the function for $n=3$ and values $p = [0.25\ 0.25\ 0.5]$ (see here) does not look like a numerical artifact. Other values that give suspicious results are tuples with a small number of entries (but more that two) that are close to the uniform distribution. | |
Jul 21, 2014 at 12:14 | history | edited | Tom Leinster | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
minor rewording
|
Jul 21, 2014 at 12:05 | history | edited | Tom Leinster | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added detail
|
Jul 21, 2014 at 11:57 | history | edited | Tom Leinster | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Corrected math
|
Jul 21, 2014 at 11:54 | history | undeleted | Tom Leinster | ||
Jul 21, 2014 at 11:53 | history | deleted | Tom Leinster | via Vote | |
Jul 21, 2014 at 11:50 | history | asked | Tom Leinster | CC BY-SA 3.0 |