Skip to main content
22 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jul 23, 2014 at 0:48 comment added John Bamberg @GeoffRobinson: no proof at all yet. A few times I thought I had it but there's always been a gaping hole. What I claimed above is false. Take $k=81$ and $z=6$. However, it yields an irrational when plugged into the formula for $x$. The best lead we have at the moment is Geoff's equation with the product of the four gcd's.
Jul 23, 2014 at 0:00 comment added Geoff Robinson If you have a complete proof ((by computer or not) that the divisibility is impossible when neither of $x,y$ is $1,$ , then you should give it as an answer.
Jul 22, 2014 at 23:56 comment added John Bamberg @ZackWolske: nothing clever, just brute force. We know that $k$ needs to be odd, and substituting $k=2n+1$ gives us $-3n^2z^4+(2n+1)(z^4-1)^2$.
Jul 22, 2014 at 15:30 comment added Zack Wolske @John: does that computer search use Baker's theorem to bound $k$? Or something clever with numbers of the form $a^2+ab+b^2$?
Jul 21, 2014 at 6:30 comment added John Bamberg A similar thing to observe is that if we ask what the solution to the quartic $$ x^4 y^4 + x^2 y^2 + 1 - k (x^4 + x^2 y^2 + y^4) = 0 $$ is in terms of $x$ (over the reals), we find that the four solutions (except when $k=y^4$) are $$ x=\pm \sqrt{ \frac{(k-1)y^2 \pm \sqrt{4k-(3+2k+3k^2)y^4+4ky^8}}{2(k-y^4)}}. $$ So then we ask when $k-\frac{3+2k+3k^2}{4}z^4+k z^8$ is a perfect square (where $k,z\in \mathbb{Z}^+$), and it seems (by computer) the answer is "if and only if $k=1$".
Jul 21, 2014 at 5:17 comment added Geoff Robinson @AaronMyerowitz: Yes, that is correct, there are several ways to refine things further, either over $\mathbb{Z},$ or $\mathbb{Z}[\omega]$, or $\mathbb{Z}[i],$ though I had not tried the last one.
Jul 21, 2014 at 4:25 comment added Aaron Meyerowitz And then (for whatever it is worth) the first thing is $\gcd(y^2-1,x^4+x^2+1)=\gcd((y-1)(y+1),(x^2+x+1)(x^2-x+1))$ which is the product of four things $\gcd(y \pm 1,x^2 \pm x +1)$ (since the two things on the right are odd and coprime while the two things on the right can share at most a factor of $2$.) Similarly for the third factor. Over $\mathbb{Z}[i]$ one could do something similar for the second and fourth.
Jul 20, 2014 at 21:23 history edited Geoff Robinson CC BY-SA 3.0
added 836 characters in body
Jul 20, 2014 at 10:53 history edited Geoff Robinson CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted some text
Jul 20, 2014 at 10:21 history edited Geoff Robinson CC BY-SA 3.0
typos
Jul 20, 2014 at 10:04 history edited Geoff Robinson CC BY-SA 3.0
Gave example
Jul 20, 2014 at 9:58 history edited Geoff Robinson CC BY-SA 3.0
Gave example
Jul 19, 2014 at 18:09 history edited Geoff Robinson CC BY-SA 3.0
Slight expansion
Jul 19, 2014 at 12:34 history edited Geoff Robinson CC BY-SA 3.0
minor clarification
Jul 19, 2014 at 11:30 history edited Geoff Robinson CC BY-SA 3.0
minor correction
Jul 19, 2014 at 1:27 history edited Geoff Robinson CC BY-SA 3.0
minor explanation
Jul 19, 2014 at 0:44 history edited Geoff Robinson CC BY-SA 3.0
Expanded answer-also minor layout change
Jul 18, 2014 at 7:39 history edited Geoff Robinson CC BY-SA 3.0
typo
Jul 17, 2014 at 15:02 history edited Geoff Robinson CC BY-SA 3.0
typo
Jul 17, 2014 at 13:31 history edited Geoff Robinson CC BY-SA 3.0
minor clarification
Jul 17, 2014 at 9:30 history edited Geoff Robinson CC BY-SA 3.0
Expanded original answer
Jul 17, 2014 at 7:40 history answered Geoff Robinson CC BY-SA 3.0