Timeline for Proof or citation?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 2014 at 21:54 | comment | added | Yemon Choi | @VítTuček Sadly some referees and editors want explanatory material removed... | |
| Jul 14, 2014 at 20:14 | comment | added | Vít Tuček | I understand. I just think that the emphasis should be on dissemination of knowledge and not on making publisher happy. ;) | |
| Jul 14, 2014 at 20:01 | comment | added | Stefan Kohl♦ | @VítTuček: I am talking about published journal articles, and space in printed journals is typically limited. -- Obviously you can provide any additional information you like on your personal homepage or on some preprint server like the arXiv etc. -- I didn't think anyone needs to be told about the latter. | |
| Jul 14, 2014 at 18:41 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by Todd Trimble | ||
| Jul 14, 2014 at 18:15 | comment | added | Vít Tuček | Why are people so obsessed with papers as short as possible? Lengthy elementary proofs can be moved to the appendix, which can be omitted in the published version. Of course, boring the reader with obvious and burying the important under tedious is wrong, but please bear in mind that it is usually the case that what seems to be obvious to the author is often impenetrable (at first reading at least) for a reader. | |
| Jul 14, 2014 at 15:56 | history | answered | Stefan Kohl♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |