Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jul 15, 2014 at 3:24 vote accept Hugo Chapdelaine
Jul 15, 2014 at 3:18 comment added Hugo Chapdelaine I see, so then may be I should add an hypothesis like semi-stability and then this means the $E/L$ should have good reduction everywhere...
Jul 15, 2014 at 0:01 history edited GH from MO
edited tags
Jul 14, 2014 at 23:24 answer added Will Sawin timeline score: 3
Jul 14, 2014 at 23:19 comment added Kestutis Cesnavicius An isogeny over $\overline{\mathbb{Q}}$ need not be defined over $K$. Another way to see that the answer to both of your questions is `no' is to take a single CM elliptic curve over $L$ and look at the family of its quadratic twists (in which the (norms of the) conductors of its members are unbounded).
Jul 14, 2014 at 19:09 history edited Hugo Chapdelaine CC BY-SA 3.0
added 22 characters in body
Jul 14, 2014 at 19:07 comment added Hugo Chapdelaine So if we look at the set of CM elliptic curves by $K$defined over $\overline{\mathbf{Q}}$, then since they are all isogeneous, they share the same set of primes of good reduction. So is it possible to determine the set of primes of bad reduction (necessarily additive since CM) stricly in terms of $K$. For example if $K$ has class number one a naive guess would be to say that the conductor is supported on primes dividing $12\cdot disc(K)$.... But this is probably to naive.
Jul 14, 2014 at 16:19 comment added Ari Shnidman The conductor of $E$ is the square of the conductor of $\psi$. Even if you fix the $j$-invariant, there are infinitely many iso classes of CM elliptic curves over $L$, and only finitely many of bounded conductor (by Shafarevich's theorem, for example).
Jul 14, 2014 at 15:33 history asked Hugo Chapdelaine CC BY-SA 3.0