Timeline for Existence of multi-variable $p$-adic $L$-functions
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Jan 9, 2020 at 22:53 | history | suggested | Alejandro Tolcachier | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
improved format title
|
| Jan 9, 2020 at 22:32 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jan 9, 2020 at 22:53 | |||||
| Jan 31, 2014 at 7:31 | history | edited | Olivier | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Improved LateX
|
| S Jan 30, 2014 at 20:39 | history | suggested | F. C. |
added one tag
|
|
| Jan 30, 2014 at 20:37 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jan 30, 2014 at 20:39 | |||||
| Sep 29, 2012 at 7:55 | comment | added | Filippo Alberto Edoardo | Hi David, I just saw this question. I guess you worked everything out, buy now, but just in case... Hida and Tilouine, for instance, discuss $p$-adic $L$ functions for arbitrary CM fields, which have many variables (something like half of the degree plus one plus Leopoldt defect). They describe this nicely in the introduction to their Inventiones, 1994. | |
| Mar 9, 2010 at 13:38 | comment | added | Kevin Buzzard | "I will study it carefully" is perhaps the compulsory response when your question is answered by your PhD supervisor ;-) | |
| Mar 9, 2010 at 13:00 | comment | added | David Loeffler | Thanks, that paper is really useful and seems to answer all of my questions -- I will study it carefully. | |
| Mar 9, 2010 at 12:37 | comment | added | Kevin Buzzard | Hey David. I don't know so much about this stuff, but I always found the introduction to Katz' "p-adic L-functions for CM fields" (Inventiones 49, 1978) very helpful. In particular he points out that in many cases (in this generality) the p-adic L-function should be the zero function for "trivial reasons". | |
| Mar 9, 2010 at 12:20 | history | asked | David Loeffler | CC BY-SA 2.5 |