Timeline for What is natural about the well-known bijection between conjugacy classes and irreps of a symmetric group?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
3 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2014 at 1:49 | comment | added | Andreas Blass | @Niccolo' My use of marriage terminology was not intended to suggest any connection to the marriage theorem. I'm not aware of any connection, but of course that doesn't imply that no connection exists. | |
| Jul 12, 2014 at 18:29 | comment | added | Niccolo' | Is it just a coincidence that the terminology you're using recalls the marriage problem, or is it because the entire situation can be re-interpreted in terms of it, and then the canonical matching of irreducible reps with conjugacy classes is just given by (one of) the usual algorithms that solve the marriage problem? | |
| Jul 12, 2014 at 16:33 | history | answered | Andreas Blass | CC BY-SA 3.0 |