Skip to main content
6 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
Jul 13, 2014 at 15:18 vote accept CommunityBot
Jul 21, 2014 at 5:20
Jul 11, 2014 at 17:50 answer added Puzzled timeline score: 3
Jul 11, 2014 at 15:07 review First posts
Jul 11, 2014 at 15:18
Jul 11, 2014 at 15:06 comment added Jason Starr You are using non-standard notations. The notation $\overline{M}_{g,n}(K)$ usually denotes the set of $K$-valued points of the scheme $\overline{M}_{g,n}$, not a (finite type) $K$-scheme. You could ask, is the natural morphism of $\overline{K}$-schemes, $$\overline{M}_{g,n,\overline{K}} \to \overline{M}_{g,n,K}\times_{\text{Spec}(K)} \text{Spec}(\overline{K})$$ an isomorphism? The answer to this is yes, because the formation of the coarse moduli space is compatible with flat base change. I recommend reading Keel-Mori for a detailed discussion of this property.
Jul 11, 2014 at 14:47 history asked user55899 CC BY-SA 3.0