Timeline for If $2^x $and $3^x$ are integers, must $x$ be as well?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
18 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nov 21, 2020 at 22:15 | comment | added | Gerald Edgar | see also math.stackexchange.com/q/378130/442 | |
Nov 21, 2020 at 20:33 | history | edited | GH from MO |
edited tags; edited tags
|
|
Jul 21, 2018 at 18:08 | comment | added | Takahiro Waki | This problem simply equal to transcendentality of $2^{\log_3 {n}}$ or $n^{\log_2{3}}$. And that is still not proved. | |
Aug 20, 2014 at 10:56 | history | edited | TetstName123 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
some TeX
|
Jul 7, 2011 at 20:26 | comment | added | Todd Trimble | It's an awesome hint, Alon. | |
Mar 9, 2010 at 18:42 | vote | accept | Alon Amit | ||
Mar 9, 2010 at 18:41 | comment | added | Alon Amit | @jef: the best hint I can think of is "calculus of differences". | |
Mar 9, 2010 at 8:32 | comment | added | Kevin Buzzard | @fpqc: go and find out what the six exponentials theorem is and then all will be much clearer. If you look at the wikipedia page, the hint is that x_i=log(p_i). | |
Mar 9, 2010 at 8:20 | comment | added | Harry Gindi | Is there a generalization of this to arbitrary collections of primes? | |
Mar 9, 2010 at 7:58 | answer | added | Kevin Buzzard | timeline score: 50 | |
Mar 9, 2010 at 6:56 | answer | added | Gerry Myerson | timeline score: 29 | |
Mar 9, 2010 at 6:41 | comment | added | Kim Morrison | I've hit this with the wiki-hammer, per the consensus of tea.mathoverflow.net/discussion/8/… | |
Mar 9, 2010 at 6:41 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by Kim Morrison | ||
Mar 9, 2010 at 4:46 | comment | added | faridrb | can I get a hint for the first one? | |
Mar 9, 2010 at 3:51 | answer | added | Jacques Carette | timeline score: 6 | |
Mar 9, 2010 at 2:25 | answer | added | Gerry Myerson | timeline score: 42 | |
Mar 9, 2010 at 1:25 | history | edited | Ben Weiss |
edited tags
|
|
Mar 9, 2010 at 1:21 | history | asked | Alon Amit | CC BY-SA 2.5 |