Timeline for Primary decomposition for modules
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
3 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
|
|
| Aug 23, 2012 at 20:45 | comment | added | Emerton | Dear Andrea, Do the two defintions really give the same notion in the Noetherian case, when the module $M$ is not finitely generated? E.g. if we consider the $\mathbb Z$-module $\mathbb Q_p/\mathbb Z_p$, as in Greg Stevenson's answer, isn't $0$ a primary submodule of this according to Matsumura's definition, but not according to the AM definition? Or am I confused? Regards, Matthew | |
| Mar 8, 2010 at 15:38 | history | answered | Andrea Ferretti | CC BY-SA 2.5 |