Skip to main content
12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jul 8, 2014 at 18:31 comment added username @NateEldredge indeed.
Jul 8, 2014 at 16:26 comment added Nate Eldredge The last inequality in your displayed proof is actually an equality, right?
Jul 8, 2014 at 5:47 comment added username @AnthonyQuas I have added it in.
Jul 8, 2014 at 5:46 history edited username CC BY-SA 3.0
added 50 characters in body
Jul 8, 2014 at 2:43 comment added Christian Remling @AnthonyQuas: This doesn't hold pointwise; we need to integrate by parts and use the assumption that $\Delta u\ge 0$.
Jul 8, 2014 at 1:32 comment added Anthony Quas Why is $|\nabla(u\chi)|\le |u||\nabla\chi|$?
Jul 7, 2014 at 21:33 comment added Deane Yang I'm not so familiar with Caccioppoli inequalities, but for an example where getting a constant less than 1 for a similar estimate really matters, see Schoen, Simon, and Yau's paper, "Curvature estimates for minimal hyper surfaces".
Jul 7, 2014 at 21:17 comment added username @DeaneYang Thank you. Caccioppoli is often used iteratively, so any number larger than one blows up. Is the optimal constant possibly smaller than one?
Jul 7, 2014 at 21:08 comment added Deane Yang This practice is rather common. Usually such an inequality is but one in a long chain of inequalities, where the exactly formula for the constant becomes more complicated but its exact formula is of no consequence to the proof. So a constant $C$ is used, whether it is really $1$ or something more elaborate. Also, the use of the constant $C$ signals more clearly that its exact value doesn't matter. That said, sometimes using the exact value of a constant does lead to useful stronger results that are sometimes missed by people who aren't keeping careful track of the constants.
Jul 7, 2014 at 20:59 history edited username CC BY-SA 3.0
corrected spelling
Jul 7, 2014 at 20:33 history edited username CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 1 character in body
Jul 7, 2014 at 20:27 history asked username CC BY-SA 3.0