Timeline for rank of Abelian schemes under ample hypersurface section
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 9, 2014 at 20:14 | comment | added | Jason Starr | @TimoKeller: Yes, I think you need uncountability for all of the arguments in that paper (unfortunately). | |
| Jul 7, 2014 at 18:18 | comment | added | user19475 | Do we need it for Lemma 5.1, 5.2 and 5.3; and Theorem 1.2(ii)? | |
| Jul 7, 2014 at 17:52 | comment | added | Jason Starr | @TimoKeller For the counterexample, I think there are no problems with $k$ being countable. However, you are quite correct that, in the last paragraph, "sufficiently general" almost certainly does require that $k$ is uncountable. | |
| Jul 7, 2014 at 13:19 | comment | added | user19475 | Are there problems as $k$ is not uncountable? | |
| S Jul 7, 2014 at 12:14 | history | answered | Jason Starr | CC BY-SA 3.0 | |
| S Jul 7, 2014 at 12:14 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by Jason Starr |