Timeline for Self-dual automorphic forms on $GL(4)$
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 28, 2014 at 23:39 | history | edited | NAME_IN_CAPS | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 142 characters in body
|
Jun 28, 2014 at 23:38 | comment | added | NAME_IN_CAPS | There is also the Yoshida lift on classical modular forms $f,g$, whose Andrianov/spinor $L$-function is $L(s-1,f)L(s,g)$ and whose standard $L$-function is $\zeta(s)L(s-2,f\otimes g)$, at least under certain circumstances. See the last paragraph (and indeed all of) Section 3 of dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jnt.2006.11.005 | |
Jun 28, 2014 at 23:16 | history | edited | NAME_IN_CAPS | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 89 characters in body
|
Jun 28, 2014 at 23:15 | comment | added | NAME_IN_CAPS | It seems that Saito-Kurokawa lift $F$ of a classical modular form $f$ has $L(s,F)=\zeta(s-k+1)\zeta(s-k+2)L(s,f)$, so automorphically this is probably just taking the direct sum of two Tate twists of the trivial rep with the automorphic rep corresponding to $f$. Again I don't really know. The Ikeda lift generalizes this to higher degree, so is probably not relevant. Langlands has the S-K case as functorality, $PGL_2\times PGL_2\rightarrow PGSp_4$, coming from the $SL_2\times SL_2 \rightarrow Sp_4$ on $L$-groups, sect 3 sunsite.ubc.ca/DigitalMathArchive/Langlands/pdf/autoreps-ps.pdf | |
Jun 28, 2014 at 22:40 | history | edited | NAME_IN_CAPS | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 36 characters in body
|
Jun 28, 2014 at 22:30 | history | edited | NAME_IN_CAPS | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1978 characters in body
|
Jun 28, 2014 at 22:12 | history | answered | NAME_IN_CAPS | CC BY-SA 3.0 |