Timeline for Switching representatives of right coset in a paper on fundamental domain of tree of GL(2)
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2014 at 12:59 | vote | accept | ProfMeowsworth | ||
| Jun 30, 2014 at 12:52 | comment | added | Matthias Wendt | I think there is a mistake in the Laurent series expansion, I have added what I think is a correction of your computation to my answer. Please check it out and tell me of remaining mistakes you find. | |
| Jun 29, 2014 at 18:11 | history | edited | ProfMeowsworth | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Follow-up to the answer of Matthias Wendt.
|
| Jun 29, 2014 at 13:23 | answer | added | Matthias Wendt | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jun 28, 2014 at 21:16 | comment | added | ProfMeowsworth | Thank you for your comment. Are you sure about this? It is correct that $\Gamma$ acts on $\mathcal{T}$ but in the whole paper only right cosets are considered for the vertices and only Proposition 1 is applied to change the representatives. | |
| Jun 28, 2014 at 19:51 | comment | added | Matthias Wendt | I believe that the claim in Takahashi's paper is not that the two matrices give the same right cosets, but that they give the same double cosets. Right multiplication as in the bonus remark is not enough, you also need to change the double coset via left multiplication with a suitable matrix from $\Gamma$. | |
| Jun 27, 2014 at 21:55 | review | Close votes | |||
| Jun 29, 2014 at 19:57 | |||||
| Jun 27, 2014 at 21:36 | review | First posts | |||
| Jun 27, 2014 at 21:39 | |||||
| Jun 27, 2014 at 21:18 | history | asked | ProfMeowsworth | CC BY-SA 3.0 |