Skip to main content
14 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 29, 2014 at 15:42 comment added Ian Agol @AlexanderChervov: that's exactly the answer I gave, thanks
Jun 28, 2014 at 18:46 comment added Alexander Chervov It seems to me Greg's Kuperberg comment reproduced here: mathoverflow.net/questions/102879/… is kind of relevant
Jun 28, 2014 at 14:15 vote accept Kay McHamilton
Jun 25, 2014 at 5:08 answer added Ian Agol timeline score: 3
Jun 25, 2014 at 4:34 comment added Ian Agol In principle, this could be determined from the paper of Kirby and Scharlemann: math.berkeley.edu/~kirby/papers/… If I get some time, I'll try to have a look to see if there's a simple way to see it.
Jun 24, 2014 at 18:16 history edited Kay McHamilton CC BY-SA 3.0
added 27 characters in body
Jun 24, 2014 at 18:12 comment added Kay McHamilton By "order of a conjugacy class C" I suppose you could mean either the cardinality of C, or order of an element of C. I meant the second thing.
Jun 24, 2014 at 17:58 comment added Hugh Thomas The sizes of the conjugacy classes given by Suter seem to differ from yours. Can you explain? Are we talking about different things somehow?
Jun 24, 2014 at 17:53 history edited Kay McHamilton CC BY-SA 3.0
added 201 characters in body
Jun 24, 2014 at 16:37 answer added Hugh Thomas timeline score: 3
Jun 24, 2014 at 15:10 comment added Kay McHamilton S., I agree that's a natural and beautiful bijection, but it is not the map I am asking about.
Jun 24, 2014 at 8:20 comment added S. Carnahan I was under the impression that the bijection with characters was more natural, since the tensor product with the 2-dimensional representation yields the extended Dynkin graph adjacency relation.
Jun 24, 2014 at 6:21 review First posts
Jun 24, 2014 at 6:49
Jun 24, 2014 at 6:02 history asked Kay McHamilton CC BY-SA 3.0