Skip to main content
8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 28, 2014 at 1:44 vote accept Jimbo
Jun 28, 2014 at 1:44 vote accept Jimbo
Jun 28, 2014 at 1:44
Jun 27, 2014 at 13:43 answer added Abdelmalek Abdesselam timeline score: 4
Jun 24, 2014 at 9:08 comment added Igor Khavkine Jimbo, it sounds like you would like someone to write a survey essay on this topic, which I think goes against the customs here in MO. I'll just mention two things. First, your list is missing the kind of QFTs you find described in physics textbooks. Second, your question about 'mathematical rigor' is ill posed. There is not one definition QFT that any mathematical object has to satisfy to get those letters in its name. Everyone has their favorite definitions and works with examples that satisfy it. Nothing non-rigorous about it.
Jun 23, 2014 at 18:44 comment added Carlo Beenakker physics.stackexchange.com/questions/56698/…
Jun 23, 2014 at 18:25 comment added Jimbo That answer doesn't explain if Topological QFTs are rigorous... can they be easily shown to follow the Wightman or Haag-Kastler Axioms?
Jun 23, 2014 at 17:56 comment added Carlo Beenakker physics.stackexchange.com/questions/19775/…
Jun 23, 2014 at 16:46 history asked Jimbo CC BY-SA 3.0