Timeline for $\zeta(n)$ as a mixed Tate motive
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2016 at 4:26 | history | edited | Myshkin |
+ tag (riemann zeta function)
|
|
| Apr 21, 2016 at 9:52 | answer | added | Nils Matthes | timeline score: 6 | |
| Feb 8, 2016 at 20:35 | answer | added | Matthias Wendt | timeline score: 8 | |
| Oct 2, 2015 at 8:47 | answer | added | Myshkin | timeline score: 12 | |
| Jul 8, 2014 at 15:00 | comment | added | Konrad Voelkel | Hm; Yoneda n-extensions up to isomorphism are in bijection with Ext^n; so you should at least write that the class of M is in Ext^1. Otherwise it will certainly confuse people, as we've seen :-) | |
| Jun 19, 2014 at 11:10 | comment | added | mtm93 | Why is it wrong? | |
| Jun 19, 2014 at 9:41 | comment | added | Mikhail Bondarko | Ok, I see; yet your notation is wrong. | |
| Jun 18, 2014 at 11:49 | comment | added | mtm93 | Think of mixed Hodge structures. | |
| Jun 18, 2014 at 11:48 | comment | added | mtm93 | I don't see what this is strange. $M$ is an object in an abelian category (mixed Tate motives over $\mathbb{Q}$) and you are looking to extensions. | |
| Jun 18, 2014 at 9:46 | comment | added | Mikhail Bondarko | This looks strange. $Ext^1$ is a group; how could a motif belong to it? | |
| Jun 17, 2014 at 10:44 | review | First posts | |||
| Jun 17, 2014 at 10:55 | |||||
| Jun 17, 2014 at 10:24 | history | asked | mtm93 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |