Timeline for Algebraic K-theory can be seen as a generalization of Linear algebra? [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
17 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 2014 at 7:31 | history | edited | user51486 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 163 characters in body
|
| Jun 9, 2014 at 4:21 | history | edited | user51486 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 26 characters in body
|
| Jun 9, 2014 at 2:41 | review | Reopen votes | |||
| Jun 9, 2014 at 6:28 | |||||
| Jun 9, 2014 at 2:26 | history | edited | user51486 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 6 characters in body
|
| Jun 8, 2014 at 23:47 | history | closed |
Stefan Kohl♦ user9072 Alain Valette j.c. Andy Putman |
Needs details or clarity | |
| Jun 8, 2014 at 20:57 | history | edited | user51486 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 133 characters in body
|
| Jun 8, 2014 at 20:51 | comment | added | Fernando Muro | Sí, una ruta para entenderlo sería: álgebra lineal -> álgebra homológica -> teoría K algebraica. Y un camino para empezar, el libro de Berrick y Keating | |
| Jun 8, 2014 at 20:30 | review | Close votes | |||
| Jun 8, 2014 at 23:48 | |||||
| Jun 8, 2014 at 20:25 | answer | added | Tom Harris | timeline score: 12 | |
| Jun 8, 2014 at 19:30 | review | Low quality posts | |||
| Jun 8, 2014 at 21:00 | |||||
| S Jun 8, 2014 at 19:28 | history | suggested | user62675 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
changed improper grammar; edited a phrase
|
| Jun 8, 2014 at 19:25 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jun 8, 2014 at 19:28 | |||||
| Jun 8, 2014 at 19:22 | answer | added | user62675 | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jun 8, 2014 at 19:20 | answer | added | Gabriel Angelini-Knoll | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jun 8, 2014 at 19:00 | review | Low quality posts | |||
| Jun 8, 2014 at 19:23 | |||||
| Jun 8, 2014 at 18:49 | comment | added | user23860 | I think half of mathematics can be thought as a generalization of Linear algebra. You can get a better answer if you specify your question a little bit more! | |
| Jun 8, 2014 at 18:38 | history | asked | user51486 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |