Timeline for Is Lang's definition of a tensor bundle nonstandard?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 2010 at 5:08 | comment | added | Kim Morrison | Please check tea.mathoverflow.net/discussion/183/comments-that-vanish if you're concerned about the recent disappearing comments here. | |
| Mar 4, 2010 at 4:34 | vote | accept | Harry Gindi | ||
| Mar 4, 2010 at 4:11 | answer | added | Tim Perutz | timeline score: 5 | |
| Mar 4, 2010 at 2:51 | answer | added | Emerton | timeline score: 5 | |
| Mar 4, 2010 at 1:41 | comment | added | Harry Gindi | I'd also just like to note that I believe that OP4 in the statement of Theorem 4.1 appears to have a typo. (I think it should read $\lambda_Y(h^*\alpha,h^*\beta)=h^*\lambda_(\alpha,\beta)$). I say this only because the notation $\lambda_Y^*$ does not appear to be defined in the text. Thanks. | |
| Mar 4, 2010 at 0:06 | comment | added | Harry Gindi | By the way, for anyone who'd like to look up the section in the book, it's on page 58 of Fundamentals of Differential Geometry by Serge Lang. It should also be included in Differential and Riemannian Manifolds Chapter 3, Section 4. I don't have that book on hand, so I can't give you the page number. | |
| Mar 3, 2010 at 23:24 | history | edited | Harry Gindi |
added a tag
|
|
| Mar 3, 2010 at 23:09 | history | asked | Harry Gindi | CC BY-SA 2.5 |