Skip to main content
5 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 9, 2014 at 23:07 comment added David Ben-Zvi @JasonPolak: I wrote something of that flavor here: mathoverflow.net/questions/84381/… - the short of it is, $\infty$ categories are perfectly suited to make formal arguments that ought to be formal. It is not a computationally effective language but one that powerfully captures the "pure thought" aspects of algebra: if you're naive about homotopy theory (like me) you can still easily prove analogs of statements that are true for robust structural reasons in a discrete setting, using these tools. A favorite example: cf. Barr-Beck-Lurie theorem.
Jun 8, 2014 at 1:00 comment added user1437 Nice answer. I was wondering if you could briefly explain the point "The ∞-language in my mind is just a very convenient and relatively friendly apparatus to understand, navigate and apply this theory." Specifically, how does the language of infinity categories make it easier to apply homotopical algebra?
Jun 6, 2014 at 23:28 comment added David Ben-Zvi I'd have liked to add something intelligent about algebraic K-theory and its triumphs as applications of homotopical algebra but can't pretend to do it justice - though I can link here.
S Jun 6, 2014 at 23:14 history answered David Ben-Zvi CC BY-SA 3.0
S Jun 6, 2014 at 23:14 history made wiki Post Made Community Wiki by David Ben-Zvi