Timeline for 1 rectangle <= 4 squares
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2010 at 22:44 | comment | added | TonyK | I can confirm your latest result for the 12x1 rectangle in a 241x126 grid. (And the first five rows are all zero, so the grid is really 231x126.) 181/48 = 3.7708333...! That's more than 3.75, isn't it? :-) | |
| Mar 4, 2010 at 8:08 | comment | added | TonyK | Given that 7x1 was no improvement on 6x1, perhaps it might be worth trying 14x1 or 15x1. | |
| Mar 4, 2010 at 7:38 | comment | added | TonyK | And I can confirm your 155x68 result too. | |
| Mar 4, 2010 at 0:31 | history | edited | F_G | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
1x12 -> 3.75 result; deleted 1 characters in body
|
| Mar 3, 2010 at 21:54 | comment | added | TonyK | I can confirm your new 15/4 result for the 12x1 rectangle. (And your first two rows are all zero, so the rectangle is really 157x82.) | |
| Mar 3, 2010 at 13:49 | comment | added | Yaakov Baruch | I can confirm the 101/27 result. I also checked the real case (no surprises) and I'm updating the related post. | |
| Mar 3, 2010 at 12:27 | history | edited | F_G | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
New 3.7407407 sum
|
| Mar 3, 2010 at 11:53 | comment | added | Yaakov Baruch | the update is impressive. Shouldn't it be part of an update to the main question itself? | |
| Mar 3, 2010 at 11:14 | history | edited | F_G | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 336 characters in body
|
| Mar 2, 2010 at 21:27 | comment | added | TonyK | I can confirm that FG's 3x7 solution attains 56/15. Well done! | |
| Mar 2, 2010 at 20:43 | history | edited | F_G | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
deleted 3 characters in body
|
| Mar 2, 2010 at 20:15 | history | answered | F_G | CC BY-SA 2.5 |