Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
S Jul 21, 2014 at 9:56 history suggested user26857 CC BY-SA 3.0
fixed a latex issue
Jul 21, 2014 at 9:53 review Suggested edits
S Jul 21, 2014 at 9:56
Jun 8, 2014 at 21:56 comment added Neil Epstein @user51197 Huh. I guess you're right; I was making things a bit too complicated. We have $e>2p-2$ since $0 \neq (xy)^{p-1} \in {\mathfrak m}^{2p-2}$, just as you say.
Jun 7, 2014 at 16:01 comment added user51197 Doesn't your counterexample in the equicharacteristic $p$ case also work when $p=2$? In that example one has (for any prime $p$, including $p=2$) $e≥2p−1$, it seems. Thus, $e>p=t$.
Jun 5, 2014 at 20:38 history edited Neil Epstein CC BY-SA 3.0
added 15 characters in body
Jun 5, 2014 at 20:27 comment added Neil Epstein @user51197 As you will see in the above edit, equality fails for any mixed characteristic pair $(p^c,p)$, which then completely resolves the question of equality. I hope this answer is now sufficient.
Jun 5, 2014 at 20:26 history edited Neil Epstein CC BY-SA 3.0
resolved the mixed characteristic case completely
Jun 5, 2014 at 19:54 comment added Neil Epstein @user51197 See my edit above for an example where $e\neq t$ in the mixed characteristic case.
Jun 5, 2014 at 19:47 history edited Neil Epstein CC BY-SA 3.0
provided a mixed characteristic counterexample
Jun 4, 2014 at 18:17 comment added user51197 Thank you. I am definitely interested in the mixed characteristic ($p^c,p)$ case. We also have $c \leq t$ to use/understand.
Jun 4, 2014 at 17:35 history answered Neil Epstein CC BY-SA 3.0