Skip to main content

Timeline for A non-linear PDE

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 3, 2014 at 0:57 comment added k3thomps @michael thank you for your patience. I was being stupid.
Jun 2, 2014 at 21:57 comment added k3thomps @renardy Ahhh, you are right. Sorry.
Jun 2, 2014 at 21:44 answer added Michael Renardy timeline score: 3
Jun 2, 2014 at 21:37 comment added Michael Renardy @k3thomps: No. According to the equation, we have $\partial_{tx}u=-(1-u)^n=-1^n=-1$. The conditions imposed are compatible.
Jun 2, 2014 at 19:45 comment added guest No - it's coming from the calculation of a combinatorial generating function. A change of variables does make this a non-linear wave equation, but as far as I know (and I hope I'm wrong!) it isn't one that has been solved so I'm not sure how much that helps.
Jun 2, 2014 at 19:14 comment added k3thomps Ummm.. This is just the wave equation in 2d in null coordinates with nonlinearity $-(1-u)^n$. Is that where you got it from?
Jun 2, 2014 at 19:13 comment added guest It was a typo - thanks for catching it.
Jun 2, 2014 at 19:12 history edited guest CC BY-SA 3.0
Corrected Type
Jun 2, 2014 at 19:05 comment added leo monsaingeon Quite unlikely, indeed... Thanks Michael Renardy for pointing that out. Is there a typo, or should we close?
Jun 2, 2014 at 18:55 comment added Michael Renardy How can you have $u(x,0)=0$ and $u_x(x,0)=1-x$?
Jun 2, 2014 at 18:53 comment added leo monsaingeon what about power series in $t,(x-1)$? but you're missing anyway a boundary condition at $x\to\infty$...
Jun 2, 2014 at 18:42 history asked guest CC BY-SA 3.0