Timeline for Holomorphic vector bundles over a Riemann surface does not satisfy $\mathbf{AB2}$ but satisfies $\mathbf{AB1}$
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
15 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:57 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
|
|
| Jun 23, 2014 at 22:49 | vote | accept | user40276 | ||
| May 30, 2014 at 5:47 | answer | added | dhy | timeline score: 5 | |
| May 29, 2014 at 23:53 | history | edited | user40276 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| May 29, 2014 at 23:18 | comment | added | user40276 | @PiotrPstrągowski It´s important if you consider sections, but in this case it´s not important. | |
| May 29, 2014 at 15:18 | comment | added | Piotr Pstrągowski | Is it important in any way that the vector bundles are holomorphic..? Shouldn't a similar remark apply to a category of (continous) vector bundles? | |
| May 29, 2014 at 14:50 | answer | added | S. Carnahan♦ | timeline score: 5 | |
| May 29, 2014 at 14:36 | comment | added | Sasha | Yes, the category of vector bundles is not abelian. | |
| May 29, 2014 at 14:05 | history | edited | user40276 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 2 characters in body
|
| May 29, 2014 at 14:00 | comment | added | user40276 | @S.Carnahan You're right, I've edited. | |
| May 29, 2014 at 13:59 | history | edited | user40276 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 2 characters in body
|
| May 29, 2014 at 13:46 | comment | added | S. Carnahan♦ | Grothendieck used the category of vector bundles, not line bundles. | |
| May 29, 2014 at 13:35 | comment | added | user40276 | @Sasha Is this true? Why? | |
| May 29, 2014 at 13:35 | comment | added | Sasha | So, what's the question? | |
| May 29, 2014 at 13:31 | history | asked | user40276 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |