Timeline for Are all almost regular graphs obvious?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 2021 at 2:50 | history | edited | Tony Huynh |
edited tags
|
|
| May 28, 2014 at 13:09 | answer | added | Douglas Zare | timeline score: 5 | |
| May 28, 2014 at 10:12 | comment | added | joro | If you add a matching won't you get multiple edges? | |
| May 28, 2014 at 5:33 | answer | added | Peter Dukes | timeline score: 4 | |
| May 27, 2014 at 16:32 | answer | added | Zack Wolske | timeline score: 1 | |
| May 27, 2014 at 15:44 | answer | added | Tony Huynh | timeline score: 15 | |
| May 27, 2014 at 14:32 | history | edited | Felix Goldberg | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| May 27, 2014 at 14:22 | answer | added | joro | timeline score: 7 | |
| May 27, 2014 at 14:17 | comment | added | joro | If you don't add vertices don't think deleting any edges from $K_{2,3}$ will leave a regular graph on 5 vertices. | |
| May 27, 2014 at 14:11 | comment | added | joro | Not sure, but are $K_{n,n+1}$ obvious? Say $K_{2,3}$? | |
| May 27, 2014 at 14:03 | history | asked | Felix Goldberg | CC BY-SA 3.0 |