Timeline for Heegaard Floer Homology of double branched cover
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2014 at 8:05 | answer | added | Marco Golla | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jun 9, 2014 at 21:37 | answer | added | christian | timeline score: 3 | |
| May 22, 2014 at 7:12 | answer | added | Ryan Budney | timeline score: 5 | |
| S May 22, 2014 at 6:48 | history | suggested | Marco Golla | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Changed tags and formatting of the question.
|
| May 22, 2014 at 6:42 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S May 22, 2014 at 6:48 | |||||
| May 22, 2014 at 6:39 | comment | added | Marco Golla | It definitely holds whenever $K$ is (Khovanov-reduced, I believe) homologically thin, and when $K$ is a 2-bridge knot. The first case follows from the spectral sequence defined by Ozsvath-Szabo, the second from the classical fact that double covers branched over 2-bridge knots are lens spaces. | |
| May 22, 2014 at 6:24 | history | asked | user44651 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |