Timeline for A categorical characterization of ordinal numbers
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 22, 2014 at 17:39 | vote | accept | fosco | ||
May 21, 2014 at 11:10 | comment | added | Giorgio Mossa | I guess that for help could be useful to characterize $\star$ by universal property, otherwise is not clear what a category (not necessarily a subcategory of $\mathbf{Cat}$) closed by $\star$ should be. | |
May 21, 2014 at 8:18 | answer | added | Paul Taylor | timeline score: 6 | |
May 20, 2014 at 14:36 | comment | added | Giorgio Mossa | Note that in the note you have linked Joyal define $\star B$ as a functor of type $\mathbf {Cat} \to B\setminus \mathbf {Cat}$ not $\mathbf {Cat} \to \mathbf {Cat}$. | |
May 20, 2014 at 14:34 | comment | added | Giorgio Mossa | The operation $\star$ does not commute with colimit: indeed if that where true then for every limit ordinal $\lambda=\bigcup_{\gamma < \lambda} \gamma$ you should have that $\lambda+1=\lambda\star[0]=\bigcup_{\gamma < \lambda} \gamma\star[0]=\bigcup_{\gamma < \lambda}\gamma+1=\lambda$ things that's not possible since $\lambda$ doesn't have a max while $\lambda+1$ does. | |
May 20, 2014 at 14:16 | history | edited | fosco | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 211 characters in body
|
May 20, 2014 at 14:01 | history | edited | fosco | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 19 characters in body
|
May 20, 2014 at 13:45 | history | asked | fosco | CC BY-SA 3.0 |