Timeline for Is Schauder's conjecture resolved?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 1, 2023 at 14:00 | history | edited | Martin Sleziak | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
a link directly to the review
|
| Jun 15, 2020 at 7:27 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Jul 25, 2016 at 18:19 | history | edited | coudy | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
typo
|
| Sep 16, 2014 at 9:25 | history | undeleted | Mohammad Golshani | ||
| May 19, 2014 at 7:13 | history | deleted | Mohammad Golshani | via Vote | |
| May 18, 2014 at 15:12 | comment | added | Mohammad Golshani | You are right. In fact it seems the problem is still open. See my new answer. | |
| May 18, 2014 at 14:17 | history | edited | Mohammad Golshani | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 563 characters in body
|
| May 18, 2014 at 14:15 | history | undeleted | Mohammad Golshani | ||
| May 18, 2014 at 13:53 | history | deleted | Mohammad Golshani | via Vote | |
| May 18, 2014 at 13:53 | history | edited | Mohammad Golshani | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 745 characters in body
|
| May 18, 2014 at 9:58 | comment | added | François G. Dorais | How does this 2003 paper address this point of the question: "apparently in the international conference 'Fixed Point Theory and its Applications' in 2005, T. Dobrowolski remarked that there is a gap in the proof." | |
| May 18, 2014 at 8:02 | history | answered | Mohammad Golshani | CC BY-SA 3.0 |