Timeline for Whitehead theorem for cohomotopy
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
3 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2014 at 11:21 | comment | added | Mark Hovey | I think you cannot get away with sufficiently large values. Suppose X and Y are finite complexes, with the top cell in degree n. Then the cohomotopy in large degrees is going to be 0 for both of them. So the question is sort of the wrong way around, it seems to me; one should instead ask if you know about low (negative) cohomotopy can you conclude something. | |
| May 14, 2014 at 17:56 | comment | added | Jeff Strom | Do you really need to assume the cohomotopy isomorphism for all degrees? Can you get away with "sufficiently large" values? | |
| May 14, 2014 at 12:30 | history | answered | Mark Hovey | CC BY-SA 3.0 |