Timeline for How to publish two interdependent papers
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
17 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8 at 21:58 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by Ben Webster♦ | ||
| Oct 12, 2017 at 3:11 | review | Close votes | |||
| Oct 12, 2017 at 8:47 | |||||
| May 6, 2014 at 18:33 | vote | accept | user50407 | ||
| May 6, 2014 at 2:07 | comment | added | Andy Putman | @Kevin : The longer a paper is, the harder it is to publish in a decent journal. I think that a good strategy when trying to figure out how to split up results into papers is to try to maximize the $L^{\infty}$ norm of the journals that they will end up in (notice that this is very different from maximizing the number of papers!). | |
| May 5, 2014 at 20:28 | comment | added | darij grinberg | I am currently in a similar situation (except worse... 2x60 pages) and have been explicitly advised by several people to not combine them (actually the two papers used to be one and I have been advised to split it in two). | |
| May 5, 2014 at 20:15 | comment | added | Kevin | I'm not experienced with publishing papers, but is there a good reason you shouldn't combine them into one paper? | |
| May 5, 2014 at 19:56 | history | edited | user50407 |
edited tags
|
|
| May 5, 2014 at 18:27 | answer | added | Alexandre Eremenko | timeline score: 8 | |
| May 5, 2014 at 18:07 | comment | added | Andy Putman | This is not a big deal. As long as both preprints are publicly available (preferably on the arXiv), it is totally normal to have logical dependencies between them. Just submit them in the normal fashion. If I were the referee of the second one, I would probably take a look at the first and make sure I believed it before I recommended accepting the second one, but I wouldn't bat an eye about it. Sometimes you can't even control things, e.g. if you have a paper that depends on a theorem of someone else and it takes a long time for them to publish it. | |
| May 5, 2014 at 17:56 | answer | added | szw1710 | timeline score: 1 | |
| May 5, 2014 at 17:46 | history | edited | Francois Ziegler | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
More descriptive title
|
| May 5, 2014 at 17:32 | answer | added | Eugene Lerman | timeline score: 12 | |
| May 5, 2014 at 17:20 | review | Close votes | |||
| May 5, 2014 at 18:14 | |||||
| May 5, 2014 at 17:00 | review | First posts | |||
| May 5, 2014 at 17:01 | |||||
| May 5, 2014 at 16:54 | comment | added | darij grinberg | "Should I put them up on arxiv" yes, independently of the context. Anyway, academia.stackexchange.com is probably better suited for such questions. | |
| May 5, 2014 at 16:48 | history | edited | user50407 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| May 5, 2014 at 16:42 | history | asked | user50407 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |