Skip to main content
Corrected French
Source Link
Olivier
  • 10.9k
  • 1
  • 47
  • 70

what is meant by a pro-object "normalise"normalisé de la facon habituelle" in SGA 1, Expose V?

My page numbers will refer to the nice typed-up version of SGA found at: http://arxiv.org/abs/math/0206203

His first mention of "pro-objet" (pro-object) is on page 99. In prop 5.3 (p105), he talks about the pro-objet associated to a fundamental functor, "normalise"normalisé de la facon habituelle" (normalized in the usual way). He uses the same phrase in prop 5.5 (p106), and in prop 5.6 (p106), he talks about an arbitrary pro objet, "mis sous forme normale" (put in normal form). What does he mean by this normal form?

what is meant by a pro-object "normalise de la facon habituelle" in SGA 1, Expose V?

My page numbers will refer to the nice typed-up version of SGA found at: http://arxiv.org/abs/math/0206203

His first mention of "pro-objet" (pro-object) is on page 99. In prop 5.3 (p105), he talks about the pro-objet associated to a fundamental functor, "normalise de la facon habituelle" (normalized in the usual way). He uses the same phrase in prop 5.5 (p106), and in prop 5.6 (p106), he talks about an arbitrary pro objet, "mis sous forme normale" (put in normal form). What does he mean by this normal form?

what is meant by a pro-object "normalisé de la facon habituelle" in SGA 1, Expose V?

My page numbers will refer to the nice typed-up version of SGA found at: http://arxiv.org/abs/math/0206203

His first mention of "pro-objet" (pro-object) is on page 99. In prop 5.3 (p105), he talks about the pro-objet associated to a fundamental functor, "normalisé de la facon habituelle" (normalized in the usual way). He uses the same phrase in prop 5.5 (p106), and in prop 5.6 (p106), he talks about an arbitrary pro objet, "mis sous forme normale" (put in normal form). What does he mean by this normal form?

Source Link
Will Chen
  • 10.7k
  • 2
  • 32
  • 74

what is meant by a pro-object "normalise de la facon habituelle" in SGA 1, Expose V?

My page numbers will refer to the nice typed-up version of SGA found at: http://arxiv.org/abs/math/0206203

His first mention of "pro-objet" (pro-object) is on page 99. In prop 5.3 (p105), he talks about the pro-objet associated to a fundamental functor, "normalise de la facon habituelle" (normalized in the usual way). He uses the same phrase in prop 5.5 (p106), and in prop 5.6 (p106), he talks about an arbitrary pro objet, "mis sous forme normale" (put in normal form). What does he mean by this normal form?