Skip to main content
7 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Aug 20, 2014 at 10:18 comment added Justin Noel Alternatively one can take the simplicial $G$-space $G^{\cdot+1}$ all of whose face maps are projection maps and whose degeneracies are diagonal maps. You can then take the product of this simplicial $G$-space with the constant simplicial $G$-space $X$. To obtain a simplicial $G$-space which levelwise looks the same as the one in the previous comment, but with different structure maps and different $G$-actions (this one is diagonal and realizes the Borel construction). When $X$ is $G$-free the augmentation admits an extra degeneracy and the the associated cochain complex is exact.
Aug 20, 2014 at 10:05 comment added Justin Noel I don't think the projection maps will define a simplicial diagram. For example, if your diagram was simplicial, there should be an equality between the two composite face maps $(g_1,g_2,x)\mapsto g_1 g_2 x$ and $(g_1,g_2,x)\mapsto g_1 x.$ The standard construction uses the group multiplication on $G$ not the projection. Using this construction one obtains an augmented simplicial $G$ space $G^{\cdot+1}\times X\rightarrow X$. This is the bar construction on $X$ and the geometric realization is $G$-homeomorphic to the Borel construction.
Aug 20, 2014 at 4:22 history edited Zhaoting Wei CC BY-SA 3.0
edited body
May 2, 2014 at 1:00 answer added Pavel Safronov timeline score: 7
May 1, 2014 at 22:50 comment added Zhaoting Wei @JohnKlein I'm considering the Cartan model. Nevertheless, any other reasonable version of equivariant cohomology is also good for me.
May 1, 2014 at 22:40 comment added John Klein There are different flavors of equivariant cohomology. Which one are you considering?
May 1, 2014 at 21:51 history asked Zhaoting Wei CC BY-SA 3.0