Timeline for An introduction to sieve method and their application, Cojocaru & Murty
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 1, 2014 at 18:22 | comment | added | rlo | Actually, wait. Unless I'm missing something, their claimed error term is wrong, and it should be $O(1/\log x)$ rather than $O(1/x^{1/4})$ (this is fine for their purposes, as the error on the next line is $O(1/\log x)$ anyway). To see it has to be at least this big, just look at the integral of the error from 3 to 4. To see that it's no bigger, split the integral into two parts, integrating from 3 to $x^{1/2}$, say, and from $x^{1/2}$ to $x$. The latter decays like $x^{-1/8}$, while the former can be bounded by $O(1/\log x)$. | |
May 1, 2014 at 17:32 | comment | added | rlo | Plugging in the lemma, you'd get an $A_1 \log t$ term. This is the same as $-A_1(1+\log(x/t))+A_1\log x + A_1$. Is that your question? | |
May 1, 2014 at 8:29 | history | edited | Doorbell | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
Apr 30, 2014 at 14:03 | comment | added | Salvo Tringali | You should definitely replace the '$x$' appearing as an upper bound for the variable $\delta$ in the expression of the integral $I$ with '$t$'. | |
Apr 30, 2014 at 13:01 | answer | added | Igor Rivin | timeline score: 1 | |
Apr 30, 2014 at 8:58 | history | edited | Doorbell | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 371 characters in body
|
Apr 30, 2014 at 8:39 | review | First posts | |||
Apr 30, 2014 at 8:59 | |||||
Apr 30, 2014 at 8:24 | history | asked | Doorbell | CC BY-SA 3.0 |