Timeline for Relation between kahler potential and Hermitian metric
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2014 at 22:38 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | ||
| Apr 27, 2014 at 23:38 | comment | added | Misha Verbitsky | I don't have access to this article; but anyway, $dd^c$ cannot be applied to metric, or to its logarithm. | |
| Apr 27, 2014 at 18:24 | comment | added | user21574 | See sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/039304409090019Y in equation 1.11, IN FACT , $h$ is hermitian metric corresponding to hermitian form, so $\log h$ here must means $\log \hat h$ which $\hat h$ is hermitian metric corresponding to hermitian form in local trivialization | |
| Apr 27, 2014 at 16:14 | comment | added | Misha Verbitsky | It makes no sense, of course; I assumed that the poster confused a metric with its potential | |
| Apr 26, 2014 at 17:41 | comment | added | Paul Reynolds | If $h$ is the Hermitian form, what is the meaning of $\log h$? | |
| Apr 25, 2014 at 14:31 | comment | added | user21574 | The question here is if $h(s_1,s_2)$ (with sections $s_i$)be hermitian structure then how can we find $h$ by using kahler potential $f$? | |
| Apr 25, 2014 at 14:19 | history | answered | Misha Verbitsky | CC BY-SA 3.0 |