Timeline for Are the higher homotopy groups of the Hawaiian earring trivial?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2017 at 13:46 | comment | added | Paul Fabel | The paper of Cannon/Conner/Zastrow correctly proves planar compacta are aspherical. My answer/comments below sketches an alternate, strategy/technique to achieve the same result via different methods. I expect the gaps can be filled in, but the purported alternate proof has yet to be written up carefully and published. | |
| Jun 25, 2017 at 8:54 | comment | added | YCor | If I understand correctly Paul's comments to his answer to this very post (mathoverflow.net/a/163868/14094) there is a gap in this general result that (general) compact sets are aspherical. | |
| Jun 25, 2017 at 3:22 | comment | added | David Roberts♦ | @AlexeyMuranov for now... | |
| Jun 25, 2017 at 2:53 | history | edited | Anton Petrunin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| Apr 20, 2014 at 11:02 | comment | added | Alexey Muranov | It is actually available publicly from the publisher's website. | |
| S Apr 20, 2014 at 6:14 | history | suggested | HMPanzo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
fixed spelling of names
|
| Apr 20, 2014 at 5:50 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Apr 20, 2014 at 6:14 | |||||
| Apr 20, 2014 at 1:46 | comment | added | Noah Snyder | Also available publicly via an author's website | |
| Apr 20, 2014 at 1:44 | history | answered | Anton Petrunin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |