Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 19, 2014 at 19:29 comment added Misha @IgorRivin: I see: Venky handled the case of opposite unipotent lattices in a lattice in the semisimple group (the only case relevant here), while Oh did not make assumptions about the ambient lattice.
Apr 19, 2014 at 18:57 comment added Igor Rivin Actually, the subject of discrete subgroups with opposite unipotents was started in the (now classical) paper of T.N.Venkataramana in the late '80s. I am not quite certain what the value added in Oh's thesis is, maybe @YvesCornulier knows...
Apr 18, 2014 at 23:58 vote accept Khalid Bou-Rabee
Apr 18, 2014 at 22:35 comment added Misha @YvesCornulier: Thanks, I lost track of what Oh knew before her work with Benoist, she covered almost all cases in her PhD thesis, the remaining cases were done with Benoist.
Apr 18, 2014 at 22:33 comment added YCor @Misha: thanks for the reference to Benoist-Oh (math.u-psud.fr/~benoist/prepubli/09sl3.pdf), t's very interesting. Btw in our case, in their notation, $F_1$ is "reducible", and in this case they give no proof, but refer to an earlier paper of Oh "Discrete subgroups generated by lattices in opposite horospherical subgroups, CRAS 323 (1996)" gauss.math.yale.edu/~ho2/cras.pdf
Apr 18, 2014 at 22:31 comment added Misha @YvesCornulier: No, even this is unknown. Proving this would be a big step forward (this would answer my question mentioned by OP in the very beginning).
Apr 18, 2014 at 22:20 comment added YCor @Misha: is it known at least if there's a Zariski-dense representation of $Z^2*Z$ into $SL_3(Z)$ whose restriction to $Z^2$ is faithful, and with image of infinite index?
Apr 18, 2014 at 18:10 history edited Misha CC BY-SA 3.0
added 584 characters in body
Apr 18, 2014 at 17:12 history answered Misha CC BY-SA 3.0