Timeline for On quantities with no very small odd prime factors; a response to Wlodzimierz Holsztynski
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2014 at 21:27 | comment | added | Joni Teräväinen | True, $p_{n+2}$ is a better limit for $|d|$ as everything works in the same way. I fixed it now. | |
| Apr 18, 2014 at 21:25 | history | edited | Joni Teräväinen | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
minor edit
|
| Apr 18, 2014 at 20:55 | comment | added | The Masked Avenger | In the definition of $C_n$, which you got mostly correct, I originally intended $|d|$ to be a power of 2 less than $p_{n+1}$, and now I want it less than $p_{n+2}$. This does not change the fundamental character of your answers though, and I appreciate your making precise the definition of $C_n$, as well as your answers. | |
| Apr 16, 2014 at 15:03 | history | answered | Joni Teräväinen | CC BY-SA 3.0 |