Timeline for $f, \hat{f} \in L^{p}\cap L^{\infty} \implies f\in B(\mathbb R)$ (algebra of Fourier- Stieltjes transforms )?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 15, 2014 at 19:19 | comment | added | Christian Remling | If $X_p\subset B$, then, in particular, any $f$ with $f,\widehat{f}\in L^p\cap L^{\infty}$ would have to satisfy $f\in L^1$ also. I don't see why this would be true (start with a smooth $f\in L^p\cap L^{\infty}$ that is not in $L^1$). | |
Apr 15, 2014 at 18:01 | comment | added | Nate Eldredge | So to rephrase, is every $f \in L^p \cap L^\infty$ the Fourier transform of some complex Borel measure? | |
Apr 15, 2014 at 13:41 | comment | added | Yemon Choi | My first instinct is to try and disprove this indirectly by using a Closed Graph Theorem / Open Mapping Theorem argument, similar to the known standard proof that the Fourier transform is not a surjection from $L^1({\bf R})$ onto $C_0({\bf R})$. In other words, rather than look for an explicit counter-example, try to prove that the norms don't match | |
Apr 15, 2014 at 11:48 | history | asked | Inquisitive | CC BY-SA 3.0 |