Skip to main content
14 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 15, 2014 at 21:07 vote accept Simd
Apr 15, 2014 at 6:51 comment added S. Carnahan @Anush Yes. The OP's exponent is precisely what is needed to cancel the $n \log 2$ from $\log \binom{n}{2k}$ for optimal $k$. This is why I needed to consider the sub-leading term with the $\pi c$ computation. If the exponent is smaller, the sums diverge even more wildly, and if the exponent is larger, the sums converge to 1.
Apr 15, 2014 at 6:28 comment added Simd Can I ask my question again in that case? Is the OP right that convergence depends on the constant in the exponent?
Apr 15, 2014 at 5:00 comment added S. Carnahan @GregMartin You're right, thanks. I've made quite a mess of this question.
Apr 15, 2014 at 4:57 history edited S. Carnahan CC BY-SA 3.0
More sign errors
Apr 14, 2014 at 7:21 comment added Greg Martin Shouldn't the function in (4) be $n$ times $-2c\log2c - (1-2c)\log(1-2c)$ rather than $-2c\log2c + (1-2c)\log(1-2c)$?
Apr 14, 2014 at 0:27 history edited S. Carnahan CC BY-SA 3.0
Sign error in log binomial
Apr 14, 2014 at 0:07 history edited S. Carnahan CC BY-SA 3.0
More explicit estimates.
Apr 13, 2014 at 14:11 comment added S. Carnahan @Anush Yes. In the fourth expansion of my list, the optimal coefficient of $n$ is about $0.14676$, and the coefficient of $n$ from the fifth sum is $-\log 2$. Thus, if you divide the exponent by more than about 4.722967, the limit diverges. [Edit: this is not accurate - see later comments.]
S Apr 13, 2014 at 11:39 history suggested user44143 CC BY-SA 3.0
improved formatting
Apr 13, 2014 at 11:34 review Suggested edits
S Apr 13, 2014 at 11:39
Apr 13, 2014 at 10:51 comment added Simd Is the OP right that convergence depends on the constant in the exponent? I can't immediately tell from your answer.
Apr 13, 2014 at 10:19 history edited S. Carnahan CC BY-SA 3.0
Forgot a 1/2 in my derivative.
Apr 13, 2014 at 9:44 history answered S. Carnahan CC BY-SA 3.0