Timeline for Reduction along an Orbit for C.-M. systems
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 11, 2014 at 21:20 | comment | added | Brightsun | Well, I'd like to understand a few initial chapters, not more than that. You are right, I'm not familiar enough with the Poisson stuff, it seems. Thanks again. | |
| Apr 11, 2014 at 21:18 | comment | added | Ben Webster♦ | @Brightsun It depends what you want to get out, of course. I don't think you necessarily need more symplectic geometry background, but Etingof's perspective is not one of pure symplectic geometry, so background in other areas like representation theory could also be useful. In terms of symplectic geometry, you might try some references that emphasize the Poisson side of things more, since that seemed to be what was throwing you off. | |
| Apr 11, 2014 at 18:55 | comment | added | Brightsun | Thanks @Ben Webster, your answer was definitely clarifying. I'm kind of new to this kind of papers, and it seems to me that Etingof's lectures are quite synthetic, when not obscure, in many passages: as a pre-study to Calogero-Moser systems I studied Ana Cannas da Silva's lectures on symplectic geometry; do you think that's enough and I can to tackle Etingof's work or would you suggest some further preliminary reading? Thanks in advance. | |
| Apr 11, 2014 at 15:24 | history | answered | Ben Webster♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |