Skip to main content
13 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Aug 9, 2018 at 12:14 comment added LSpice It is important to note that, despite your title, you are not asking about representations of algebraic groups (i.e., algebraic representations over the defining field); you are asking about representations of the groups of rational points of algebraic groups (i.e., (presumably) complex representations).
Apr 27, 2014 at 8:28 vote accept Jianrong Li
Apr 12, 2014 at 15:50 comment added Marc Palm I also recommend Bushnell-Henniart Local Langlands for GL(2) for the Bushnell-Kutzko theory. It is more digestible for a beginner, I think.
Apr 11, 2014 at 12:57 comment added Jianrong Li @DavidLoeffler, thank you very much.
Apr 11, 2014 at 12:36 comment added David Loeffler The Bushnell-Kutzko book is this one: press.princeton.edu/titles/5270.html
Apr 11, 2014 at 8:59 answer added Marc Palm timeline score: 8
Apr 11, 2014 at 8:57 comment added Marc Palm When $F$ is local non-archimedean field,...
Apr 11, 2014 at 8:42 comment added Jianrong Li @TobiasKildetoft, thank you very much. I have edited the post.
Apr 11, 2014 at 8:41 history edited Jianrong Li CC BY-SA 3.0
added 84 characters in body
Apr 11, 2014 at 8:39 comment added Jianrong Li @DavidLoeffler, thank you very much. What is the name of the book of Bushnell and Kutzko?
Apr 11, 2014 at 8:29 comment added David Loeffler Even in the Bernstein--Zelevinsky setting their classification isn't the end of the story: one still has to classify the cuspidals (which is much harder), cf. the book of Bushnell and Kutzko.
Apr 11, 2014 at 8:16 comment added Tobias Kildetoft I think this question is way too broad, and thus does not really allow for any sort of answer. What other fields might you be interested in? And what other algebraic groups? And what sort of problems in their representation theory?
Apr 11, 2014 at 7:48 history asked Jianrong Li CC BY-SA 3.0