Skip to main content
8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 28, 2020 at 6:05 vote accept Per Alexandersson
Apr 10, 2014 at 15:48 answer added Timothy Chow timeline score: 10
Apr 10, 2014 at 14:31 history edited Per Alexandersson CC BY-SA 3.0
clarified
Apr 10, 2014 at 14:15 comment added Per Alexandersson In my opinion, the interesting part here is essentially the existence and finiteness of Grahams bound, not so much the size. If the proof in some sense relies on Grahams number in an essential way, then this is an application, but if there is a lot of extra effort to find a bound of the number, then it does not add so much extra value, I think. Similarly, the recent progress of the twin prime conjecture is not really about the size of the gap between primes, but its finiteness, even though the initial number was a quite large number (70 millions).
Apr 10, 2014 at 13:17 comment added Todd Trimble Are you primarily interested in applications of individual large numbers (such as the Skewes number, which by now is just an artifact, or Graham's number which has a curious provenance), or in fast-growing sequences? I'd think it is the latter that has greater theoretical significance.
Apr 10, 2014 at 12:08 answer added user46855 timeline score: 5
Apr 10, 2014 at 11:39 history made wiki Post Made Community Wiki by S. Carnahan
Apr 10, 2014 at 11:27 history asked Per Alexandersson CC BY-SA 3.0