Timeline for Does the Maynard-Tao Theorem apply to general tuples of linear forms?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
|
|
| Mar 6, 2015 at 19:42 | answer | added | Eric Naslund | timeline score: 6 | |
| Apr 8, 2014 at 1:56 | comment | added | Terry Tao | Andrew's survey states explicitly that the arguments extend to arbitrary linear forms (see bottom of page 6). In your notation, the $g_i$ stay fixed as $N \to \infty$, so the error terms from Bombieri-Vinogradov etc. are still acceptable. (Of course, as the $g_i$ get larger, one expects $N$ and hence $n$ to get larger also, but the theorem of James and myself does not specify any bound on these $n$, only that they appear infinitely often.) | |
| Apr 7, 2014 at 23:01 | comment | added | Gerry Myerson | I have nothing to contribute here, but perhaps people would enjoy knowing that on page 2 of the arxiv paper referenced in the 1st paragraph above it says, $$\rm One\ might\ refer\ to\ strings\ of\ consecutive,\ congruent\ primes\ as\ ``Shiu\ strings''.$$ | |
| Apr 7, 2014 at 21:37 | history | edited | anon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
reworded title to make it a more accurate description of the quesiton
|
| Apr 7, 2014 at 21:27 | history | edited | anon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 6 characters in body
|
| Apr 7, 2014 at 21:20 | history | asked | anon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |