Skip to main content
14 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
Nov 11, 2014 at 7:48 vote accept Jesko Hüttenhain
Nov 8, 2014 at 1:07 answer added Bjorn Poonen timeline score: 13
Apr 9, 2014 at 12:43 vote accept Jesko Hüttenhain
Nov 11, 2014 at 7:48
Apr 7, 2014 at 18:16 answer added Puzzled timeline score: 4
Apr 7, 2014 at 13:04 comment added Jesko Hüttenhain @user76758: Thank you! This looks promising.
Apr 7, 2014 at 12:41 comment added user76758 @JeskoHüttenhain: Are you reading the proof of the theorem of the cube in Mumford's book on abelian varieties? An excellent characteristic-free reference on Bertini theorems (of many flavors!) is the book by Jouanolou (just Google that name and "Bertini"). And Chow's Lemma is valid with separatedness rather than completeness (even though Hartshorne's textbook exercise imposes completeness); e.g., look in EGA II, 5.6.
Apr 7, 2014 at 12:26 comment added Jesko Hüttenhain That's true, but as you said, it only works in characteristic zero.
Apr 7, 2014 at 12:21 comment added Alex Degtyarev If you are in characteristic $0$, you can resolve the singularities, apply the statement to any pair of points in the respective exceptional divisors, and then map the curve back to $X$.
Apr 7, 2014 at 11:07 history edited Jesko Hüttenhain CC BY-SA 3.0
added 860 characters in body
Apr 7, 2014 at 7:54 comment added abx There is no smoothness assumption in the second Bertini theorem, see for instance this paper, Theorem 5.3.
Apr 7, 2014 at 7:46 comment added Jesko Hüttenhain But here we are back to the original problem: Why can I apply Bertini when $X$ is not smooth?
Apr 7, 2014 at 7:28 comment added abx If you accept to have your $X$ quasi-projective, you can just apply directly Bertini's theorem to the linear system of hyperplanes passing through $x$ and $y$. If $X$ contains the line $\langle x,y\rangle$ you are done, otherwise Bertini tells you that a general divisor in the system is irreducible, and you get the result by induction on the dimension.
Apr 7, 2014 at 6:51 history asked Jesko Hüttenhain CC BY-SA 3.0