Timeline for homology with compact supports
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20 at 0:43 | comment | added | David Roberts♦ | For ease of reference: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Borel%E2%80%93Moore_homology | |
| Feb 25, 2010 at 0:24 | answer | added | Paul | timeline score: 1 | |
| Feb 24, 2010 at 20:20 | comment | added | jvkersch | Great!! You're right, this fits the example perfectly, but it also helped me to understand some constructions that I was thinking about. It turns out that BM homology is just the tool that I need. | |
| Feb 24, 2010 at 20:15 | vote | accept | jvkersch | ||
| Feb 24, 2010 at 19:22 | answer | added | Igor Belegradek | timeline score: 5 | |
| Feb 24, 2010 at 17:05 | answer | added | Emerton | timeline score: 13 | |
| Feb 24, 2010 at 16:15 | comment | added | Torsten Ekedahl | My guess is that they are referring to what is usually called Borel-Moore homology (or homology with closed support). That fits at least with their given example. (A quick glance at Wikipedia indicates that the entry on Borel-Moore homology gives a correct description of it.) | |
| Feb 24, 2010 at 15:29 | answer | added | Mariano Suárez-Álvarez | timeline score: 1 | |
| Feb 24, 2010 at 15:24 | history | asked | jvkersch | CC BY-SA 2.5 |