Timeline for Holomorphic maps on $\mathbb{R}^{n}$ (for n not necessarily even)
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 2015 at 23:39 | vote | accept | Ali Taghavi | ||
| Apr 7, 2014 at 4:18 | history | edited | Ali Taghavi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 16 characters in body
|
| Apr 7, 2014 at 4:13 | comment | added | Ali Taghavi | @user36931 However I wrote in the "motivation" "HP_{2} implies holomorphicity", but now I realize that my argument was not complete! What is your reason for "diagonal maps"?(Note that HP2 was that "harmonic maps are invariant under derivation of X" th question is X holomorphic? | |
| Apr 6, 2014 at 14:02 | answer | added | Alexandre Eremenko | timeline score: 7 | |
| Apr 6, 2014 at 13:26 | comment | added | user36931 | By the above i meant property one. I see it if the map is "diagonal" but not if it mixes up the two factors. | |
| Apr 6, 2014 at 13:14 | comment | added | user36931 | Why does your property hold for maps C^2 \to C^2 ? Also see mathoverflow.net/questions/93069/…. | |
| Apr 6, 2014 at 13:07 | history | edited | Ali Taghavi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited tags
|
| Apr 6, 2014 at 13:01 | history | edited | Ali Taghavi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 6 characters in body
|
| Apr 6, 2014 at 12:48 | history | asked | Ali Taghavi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |