Timeline for Why quintics are Calabi-Yau?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S May 10, 2014 at 15:53 | history | suggested | user21574 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
typo edited
|
| May 10, 2014 at 15:40 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S May 10, 2014 at 15:53 | |||||
| Apr 10, 2014 at 0:02 | comment | added | Dirk | I find the question "Why quintics are Calabi-Yau" rather cryprtic. Would you mind to give some more information? | |
| Apr 6, 2014 at 5:10 | review | Close votes | |||
| Apr 16, 2014 at 14:37 | |||||
| Apr 6, 2014 at 3:22 | answer | added | Puzzled | timeline score: 17 | |
| Apr 6, 2014 at 2:00 | comment | added | Alicia Garcia-Raboso | The adjunction formula tells you that the canonical bundle of a quintic threefold vanishes. You can write down an explicit holomorphic volume form using residues (see, e.g., Chapter 5 of Griffiths and Harris). | |
| S Apr 6, 2014 at 1:47 | review | Low quality posts | |||
| Apr 6, 2014 at 1:53 | |||||
| S Apr 6, 2014 at 1:47 | review | First posts | |||
| Apr 6, 2014 at 5:42 | |||||
| Apr 6, 2014 at 1:31 | history | asked | user49217 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |