Timeline for Final topology of surjective linear map on Banach space
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 2017 at 6:08 | comment | added | Duchamp Gérard H. E. | In favour of NOT closing: this is the first discussion you find when you type "final topology" on MO search. This is of "research facilitation" level as many researchers believe (and in many cases rightly) that final topologies are tricky. | |
| Apr 3, 2014 at 18:35 | comment | added | barcelos | Your question has a very simple answer: NO. | |
| Apr 3, 2014 at 13:33 | comment | added | TaQ | I don't know whether there is such a need. I am just trying to understand whether there is any consistent attitude in MO to "off-topic" questions. | |
| Apr 3, 2014 at 12:39 | comment | added | Jochen Wengenroth | I agree that this is not research level. Is there any need to close when it is answered and the answer is accepted? | |
| Apr 3, 2014 at 12:22 | vote | accept | jmk | ||
| Apr 3, 2014 at 10:39 | comment | added | TaQ | So the question is a simple exercise in basic functional analysis. Why there are no downvotes, nor suggestions to close? Is the question such a "research level" one that it is worth answering? | |
| Apr 3, 2014 at 7:12 | history | answered | Jochen Wengenroth | CC BY-SA 3.0 |