Timeline for On the Complement of a subgroup
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
|
|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:19 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://math.stackexchange.com/ with https://math.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 29, 2014 at 13:18 | history | edited | Lee Mosher |
edited tags
|
|
| Mar 28, 2014 at 22:35 | vote | accept | user48877 | ||
| Mar 28, 2014 at 22:33 | answer | added | Geoff Robinson | timeline score: 3 | |
| Mar 28, 2014 at 22:18 | comment | added | user48877 | But in the proof it Seems that $N$ need a complement | |
| Mar 28, 2014 at 22:06 | review | First posts | |||
| Mar 28, 2014 at 22:29 | |||||
| Mar 28, 2014 at 22:04 | comment | added | Johannes Hahn | I think that might be a typo and what he really wanted to write is that $H$ has a complement because $|H|$ and $|G:H|=p|PSL(2,p)|$ are coprime. This follows from the theorem of Schur-Zassenhaus (which can be derived from Gaschütz' theorem I think) | |
| Mar 28, 2014 at 22:03 | history | edited | Peter LeFanu Lumsdaine | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
fixed link (and grammar)
|
| Mar 28, 2014 at 21:50 | history | asked | user48877 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |